Hello. I am Dr. Peter C. Kang, medical director of NOSELAB.

Today, I will explain the functional issues that must be checked during a revision rhinoplasty consultation. Patients considering revision surgery often first bring up cosmetic concerns such as the shape of the nasal bridge, tip height, or asymmetry; however, when planning the actual surgery, we must also evaluate breathing function.

NOSELAB COLUMN

Tens of thousands of surgical cases

Dedicated to the function and beauty of the nose

Knowing when nasal obstruction started is important.

The first thing to determine during a revision consultation is whether nasal obstruction was present before the first surgery, developed newly after surgery, or gradually worsened over time. Depending on whether only one side is blocked or both sides alternate, we consider different possibilities involving the septum, inferior turbinates, nasal valves, or mucosal rhinitis.

If revision surgery is planned without thoroughly checking these aspects, the patient may end up with an improved external appearance while persistent congestion remains. Above all, during a revision consultation, it is necessary to document the points of discomfort by dividing them into aesthetic and functional aspects.

The septum and previously used materials must be evaluated.

In revision surgery, we must check whether the septum is deviated and how much septal cartilage was used in previous surgeries. Because the septum is involved in both the internal nasal airway and tip support, we cannot simply look at the amount of remaining cartilage; we must also assess how stably the current nasal tip is being supported.

Revision surgery is the process of identifying remaining structures and rebuilding only what is necessary.

Surgical plans may vary depending on whether silicone implants, septal cartilage, ear cartilage, or autologous rib cartilage were used in previous surgeries. At our clinic, rather than using an excessive amount of material, we believe it is essential to determine whether the current support structure is sufficient and, if deficient, which areas need reinforcement.

NOSELAB COLUMN

Choosing graft materials for each patient

Septal cartilage
Costal cartilage (rib cartilage)
Autologous dermis
Auricular cartilage (ear cartilage)

We also check the nasal valves and inferior turbinates.

During a revision consultation, it is beneficial to assess the following functional checklist alongside aesthetic concerns.

  • Septum: We check for deviation, septal defects, and tip support. Overlooking this may result in residual unilateral nasal obstruction.

  • Inferior turbinates: We evaluate hypertrophy, mucosal swelling, and concurrent rhinitis. This can be the cause of bilateral congestion.

  • Internal nasal valve: We examine whether the middle airway inside the nose is narrowed. This can be related to a sensation of tightness when inhaling.

  • External nasal valve: We look at the support of the alae and nostril rims, checking whether there is a feeling of nostril collapse upon inhalation.

Because the nasal valve is a narrow airway passage, it must be evaluated during revision surgery. Patients who have had procedures to narrow the nasal bridge or whose tip support has weakened may experience nasal stuffiness when breathing in. In such cases, we must plan how to reconstruct the support structures alongside cosmetic correction.

Scar contracture and mucosal condition are also functional issues.

During a revision consultation, we must also assess the degree of skin stiffness, any contracted upward pulling of the tip, mucosal dryness, and history of inflammation. If scar contracture is present, it is difficult to achieve the desired shape immediately, and if the mucosal condition is poor, stuffiness may persist longer during post-surgery recovery.

Evaluating functional issues does not mean that every patient requires septoplasty or turbinate surgery. Rather, what is more important in revision surgery is not missing necessary corrections while minimizing unnecessary manipulations.

NOSELAB COLUMN

The NOSELAB approach

Comprehensive preoperative assessmentUniversity-hospital-level assessment with over 500 structural and functional checks
One-to-one care and detailed analysisAnalyze examination results using advanced equipment
A systematic approach to surgical safetyIndividual consultation and surgery based on careful analysis
Specialist medical careConsultation and care with Dr. Peter C. Kang, dedicated to rhinoplasty

Conclusion

A revision consultation is an opportunity to improve nasal aesthetics, and at the same time, a process of identifying why discomfort occurred. Only by thoroughly verifying the onset of nasal obstruction, the status of the septum and nasal valves, turbinate and mucosal issues, and past material use can we work toward both a natural shape and stable function.

This has been Dr. Peter C. Kang, medical director of NOSELAB.

#revisionconsultation #revisionrhinoplasty #functionalrhinoplasty #nasalobstruction #deviatedseptum #nasalvalve #inferiorturbinate #NOSELAB